Also, if the text was written by AI, it means that none of your feedback will have an impact on author’s next post. Your feedback is talking to a machine that isn’t even listening.
To me that seems like the difference between text written by AI, and text written with AI. Selection as a steering mechanism for AI currently only works well with a human curator. This applies during writing (choosing between options, or choosing when to intervene with manual edits), but just as well applies after writing (seeing feedback on a piece, and learning how to improve your own curatorial instinct).
After that, the hope is that with future tools, curating a better past context window will itself lead to better future AI writing outputs. But I don’t think the tools are there yet.
Also, if the text was written by AI, it means that none of your feedback will have an impact on author’s next post. Your feedback is talking to a machine that isn’t even listening.
To me that seems like the difference between text written by AI, and text written with AI. Selection as a steering mechanism for AI currently only works well with a human curator. This applies during writing (choosing between options, or choosing when to intervene with manual edits), but just as well applies after writing (seeing feedback on a piece, and learning how to improve your own curatorial instinct).
After that, the hope is that with future tools, curating a better past context window will itself lead to better future AI writing outputs. But I don’t think the tools are there yet.