cryonics companies being “well run” in the sense that they don’t implode as often as normal companies does not imply that cryonics ceos could simply run a normal company vastly more successfully than normal ceos. running a company for stability vs running it for rapid expansion, market dominance, etc are very different skills. most companies do not have “continue existing at all costs” as an explicit goal; part of their strategy involves making big gambles, because otherwise they’d become irrelevant. the organizations that do indeed have this goal, like insurance companies or retirement funds, routinely exist for many decades, and only very rarely fail.
cryonics companies being “well run” in the sense that they don’t implode as often as normal companies does not imply that cryonics ceos could simply run a normal company vastly more successfully than normal ceos. running a company for stability vs running it for rapid expansion, market dominance, etc are very different skills. most companies do not have “continue existing at all costs” as an explicit goal; part of their strategy involves making big gambles, because otherwise they’d become irrelevant. the organizations that do indeed have this goal, like insurance companies or retirement funds, routinely exist for many decades, and only very rarely fail.