Now that is very interesting—I had heard of such cases, but I wasn’t thinking of them when I spoke. They derive from the very common (legally incorrect) idea that derivative works are always illegal, of course.
Unfortunately, it isn’t really a defense for me—I felt, as I spoke, that I was engaged in false rhetoric, because I didn’t believe what I was saying.
Now that is very interesting—I had heard of such cases, but I wasn’t thinking of them when I spoke. They derive from the very common (legally incorrect) idea that derivative works are always illegal, of course.
Unfortunately, it isn’t really a defense for me—I felt, as I spoke, that I was engaged in false rhetoric, because I didn’t believe what I was saying.