Would be interested in receipts for people saying “your criteria are too ambiguous”
It’s something I thought in my head. I don’t recall any specific public comments but I’m sure someone said it at some point.
particularly cases of people who suggested less ambiguous criteria that appear in hindsight to have been good ones
It is very much not my job to propose criteria that would make it safe to proceed with building potentially world-ending technology. It is the job of the people who are building it. If they can’t come up with a clear explanation of why they’re not going to kill everyone, then prima facie they are morally obligated to not build it.
It’s something I thought in my head. I don’t recall any specific public comments but I’m sure someone said it at some point.
It is very much not my job to propose criteria that would make it safe to proceed with building potentially world-ending technology. It is the job of the people who are building it. If they can’t come up with a clear explanation of why they’re not going to kill everyone, then prima facie they are morally obligated to not build it.