It seems implausible that a superintelligent being would simultaneously believe that something was the wrong thing to do and then do that thing; the reason why humans do this is because we have the intelligence required to host multiple instrumental utility functions without being able to perfectly coherently integrate all of them into a global terminal utility function. This seems like an ideosyncracy of human-level intelligences.
It seems implausible that a superintelligent being would simultaneously believe that something was the wrong thing to do and then do that thing; the reason why humans do this is because we have the intelligence required to host multiple instrumental utility functions without being able to perfectly coherently integrate all of them into a global terminal utility function. This seems like an ideosyncracy of human-level intelligences.