I’m hesitant to criticise your campaign statement as no doubt it has been carefully crafted over months—but it strikes me as a bit wordy and lacking punch. Though maybe this is the point—to appear measured and slightly ponderous/academic rather than risking looking like activism & sloganizing?
Also could be a bit clearer in other ways—e.g. on a cursory read it’s not clear that specialised and superintelligent AIs are being contrasted, or what the difference is (aren’t these specialised AIs also ‘superintelligent’ i.e. better than humans at what they do? Just not at everything)
Great post & work.
I’m hesitant to criticise your campaign statement as no doubt it has been carefully crafted over months—but it strikes me as a bit wordy and lacking punch. Though maybe this is the point—to appear measured and slightly ponderous/academic rather than risking looking like activism & sloganizing?
Also could be a bit clearer in other ways—e.g. on a cursory read it’s not clear that specialised and superintelligent AIs are being contrasted, or what the difference is (aren’t these specialised AIs also ‘superintelligent’ i.e. better than humans at what they do? Just not at everything)