I think he means ‘Watson is evidence we’re making progress on AGI, but has nothing to do with freindliness, so uFAI is more likely than before’
yea, this.
Also, “why would [future event] be closer today than it was in the past” is kinda silly phrasing. The future being closer today than it was yesterday is usually considered rather obvious I think.
I think he means ‘Watson is evidence we’re making progress on AGI, but has nothing to do with freindliness, so uFAI is more likely than before’
yea, this.
Also, “why would [future event] be closer today than it was in the past” is kinda silly phrasing. The future being closer today than it was yesterday is usually considered rather obvious I think.