So, next week, I will propose that we establish a truly global expert panel nominated by the countries and organisations attending to publish a State of AI Science report
This could result in something. Right now there seems to be a sort of quiet majority position among AI researchers that the risk is substantial and potentially near, but that was just a survey, over AI researchers who had not really been invited to engage deeply with the topic and reach an actionable conclusion.
This could be the point when this becomes global common knowledge, the atmosphere in government and in the public consciousness could tilt.
100mn for safety research
£2.5bn in quantum computers, which can be exponentially quicker than those computers still.
This could be read as investing 25 times as much into the most inscrutable, potent form of capabilities research? There are very few people who even have intuitions for what QCs are capable of, I don’t feel great about this xD
This could result in something. Right now there seems to be a sort of quiet majority position among AI researchers that the risk is substantial and potentially near, but that was just a survey, over AI researchers who had not really been invited to engage deeply with the topic and reach an actionable conclusion.
This could be the point when this becomes global common knowledge, the atmosphere in government and in the public consciousness could tilt.
This could be read as investing 25 times as much into the most inscrutable, potent form of capabilities research? There are very few people who even have intuitions for what QCs are capable of, I don’t feel great about this xD