When you’re saying “oops,” you’re just saying “oops” about the scheme you propose at the end, right? Because I still don’t believe in observers either.
The whole post and concept still has valuable perspective and insight, but there are fatal mistakes that sink anthropic atheism in the current incarnation as a general theory of anthropics. I still think the real deal isn’t going to have anything like reference classes or “observer moments”.
When you’re saying “oops,” you’re just saying “oops” about the scheme you propose at the end, right? Because I still don’t believe in observers either.
The whole post and concept still has valuable perspective and insight, but there are fatal mistakes that sink anthropic atheism in the current incarnation as a general theory of anthropics. I still think the real deal isn’t going to have anything like reference classes or “observer moments”.