Only in their rhetoric, which is at most weakly correlated with their actual policy decisions.
Yes, but in this case, the rhetoric matters. I believe this was Stuart’s point. If we want to raise the “sanity waterline”, then, all else being equal, saner political dialog is a good thing. Right?
Yes, but in this case, the rhetoric matters. I believe this was Stuart’s point. If we want to raise the “sanity waterline”, then, all else being equal, saner political dialog is a good thing. Right?
oxymoron.
No, sane political dialog is an oxymoron. Saner political dialog isn’t, just as “bigger shrimp” isn’t.