It’s a discussion of some common and rather significant biases in modern anthropology and geology, with a side of Robert E Howard for amusement purposes. I suppose said biases have probably been mentioned before in some context, but that’s life.
One might also ask why Mr Howard’s writing is so much more realistic, if one wanted to wring the last bit of relevance out of the article.
It’s a discussion of some common and rather significant biases in modern anthropology and geology, with a side of Robert E Howard for amusement purposes. I suppose said biases have probably been mentioned before in some context, but that’s life.
One might also ask why Mr Howard’s writing is so much more realistic, if one wanted to wring the last bit of relevance out of the article.