You wrote public posts advocating for donations to Alex Bores and Scott Weiner. AFAIK you never followed up with a post saying that you thought their campaigns had now received enough funding. Is that because you still think it’s one of the top priorities, or some other reason (e.g. not wanting to seem adversarial)? I realize that if it’s #2 then you can’t answer this question but it seems to me that if you publicly argue for donations to something and then later you believe the room-for-more-funding is filled, then it’s good to provide a public update.
(I wouldn’t go so far as to say that it’s obligatory to provide a public update. I believe [weakly held] that writing the initial posts and not following up is better than not writing any posts.)
You wrote public posts advocating for donations to Alex Bores and Scott Weiner. AFAIK you never followed up with a post saying that you thought their campaigns had now received enough funding. Is that because you still think it’s one of the top priorities, or some other reason (e.g. not wanting to seem adversarial)? I realize that if it’s #2 then you can’t answer this question but it seems to me that if you publicly argue for donations to something and then later you believe the room-for-more-funding is filled, then it’s good to provide a public update.
(I wouldn’t go so far as to say that it’s obligatory to provide a public update. I believe [weakly held] that writing the initial posts and not following up is better than not writing any posts.)
I continue to believe that donations to Bores are the #1 best donation opportunity, and that donations to Wiener are the #2 donation opportunity!