I’ve also noticed “liberals” making more sense, but I attribute this to smart people abandoning conservative groups and jumping ship to liberal ones. This may mean that “conservative” policies are being under-argued.
But if they’re wrong, then they’d have always been wrong, and Karl should have just been liberal, rather than becoming more so when surrounded by liberals.
I’ve also noticed “liberals” making more sense, but I attribute this to smart people abandoning conservative groups and jumping ship to liberal ones. This may mean that “conservative” policies are being under-argued.
There may also be a limit to how wisely one can argue that spending money on wars while cutting taxes for the wealthy is sound economic policy.
Does any viewpoint have a right to survive in spite of being wrong?
But if they’re wrong, then they’d have always been wrong, and Karl should have just been liberal, rather than becoming more so when surrounded by liberals.
But that means that people cannot change their mind and realize when they are wrong.