I think quantified intuitions is a reasonable, although incomplete version of what you describe. It specifically focuses on scope insensitivity rather than a traditional rationalist curriculum.
I would lightly argue scope insensitivity (and calibration!) are both traditional rationalist topics. Incomplete, yes, but I think they’re both well served by quantified intuitions and they’d be part of my ideal rationalist training program.
I think quantified intuitions is a reasonable, although incomplete version of what you describe. It specifically focuses on scope insensitivity rather than a traditional rationalist curriculum.
I would lightly argue scope insensitivity (and calibration!) are both traditional rationalist topics. Incomplete, yes, but I think they’re both well served by quantified intuitions and they’d be part of my ideal rationalist training program.
Thank you! I didn’t know about quantified intuitions. I’m checking it out now!