What does it mean to send “one sentence” to the future? Does the future understand English? How precise of a concept can we give them?
This is, of course, correct. Always question and argue with the genie until you find an exploit, then encode Wikipedia into a run-on.
eventually the judge finds you in contempt.
“there is a copy of all the knowledge of the ancients buried at the ”
At first I was like, “lulz I can just insert coordinates”, but then I realized they don’t have GPS. Serious dark ages...
The only unambiguously specifiable terrestrial spot I can think of is the south pole, but there must be something better.
If you have the resources to put something at the south pole, you probably have the resources to scatter a couple dozen stonehenges/pyramids/giant stone heads around; then you don’t have to specify unambiguously, plus redundancy is always good.
then we hack the judge too.
This is, of course, correct. Always question and argue with the genie until you find an exploit, then encode Wikipedia into a run-on.
eventually the judge finds you in contempt.
“there is a copy of all the knowledge of the ancients buried at the ”
At first I was like, “lulz I can just insert coordinates”, but then I realized they don’t have GPS. Serious dark ages...
The only unambiguously specifiable terrestrial spot I can think of is the south pole, but there must be something better.
If you have the resources to put something at the south pole, you probably have the resources to scatter a couple dozen stonehenges/pyramids/giant stone heads around; then you don’t have to specify unambiguously, plus redundancy is always good.
then we hack the judge too.