Interesting result from misreading the question: I first tried to resolve this as “are the first and second figures in (b) a rotation of the first and second figures in (a)?”
Trying to mentally rotate the first figure in (a) to get the first figure in (b) crashed the entire process, to the point where I began to doubt whether I could mentally rotate things in my mind. On the other hand, it was immediately clear to me on inspection that they weren’t the same, in a similar way that it’s clear an acute and an obtuse angle aren’t the same angle.
However, resolving the question as intended produces the subjective experience of “rotating in my mind”.
Interesting result from misreading the question: I first tried to resolve this as “are the first and second figures in (b) a rotation of the first and second figures in (a)?”
Trying to mentally rotate the first figure in (a) to get the first figure in (b) crashed the entire process, to the point where I began to doubt whether I could mentally rotate things in my mind. On the other hand, it was immediately clear to me on inspection that they weren’t the same, in a similar way that it’s clear an acute and an obtuse angle aren’t the same angle.
However, resolving the question as intended produces the subjective experience of “rotating in my mind”.
Exactly the same misreading here.