Knowing that framing is a thing makes it safe, as you can work with thoughts about the same content presented in multiple alternative framings separately, there is no tradeoff (the danger is when you are unaware that framing can have a huge influence on reasoning, and needs to be given proper attention). Refusing to entertain a framing is then not very different from refusing to consider an idea, and similarly with insisting on a particular framing, or insisting that you consider a particular idea. So treatment of boundaries in discourse seems more of a crux than framing vs. content.
Knowing that framing is a thing makes it safe, as you can work with thoughts about the same content presented in multiple alternative framings separately, there is no tradeoff (the danger is when you are unaware that framing can have a huge influence on reasoning, and needs to be given proper attention). Refusing to entertain a framing is then not very different from refusing to consider an idea, and similarly with insisting on a particular framing, or insisting that you consider a particular idea. So treatment of boundaries in discourse seems more of a crux than framing vs. content.
I can’t make out anything but word salad from this comment.