There’s a related problem; Humans have a tendency to once they have terms for something take for granted that something that looks at a glance to make rough syntactic sense that it actually has semantics behind it.
I’m not sure. Cached thoughts generally make semantic sense. So I’m not sure this is the same thing. The surface analogy issue does seem closer though.
Isn’t this the same issue we see with surface analogies and cached thoughts?
I’m not sure. Cached thoughts generally make semantic sense. So I’m not sure this is the same thing. The surface analogy issue does seem closer though.