Hume would agree because he never accepted the full force of his own argument. He couldn’t imagine how people can create knowledge without induction even though he could see that induction is impossible. It took Popper to explain how knowledge can be created without induction.
Critical Rationalism has advanced somewhat since Popper.
I think Hume would agree.
Not very significantly. The revolution happened mostly without them.
After reconsidering your statement, I have come to agree.
Who do you think advanced CR? I think only David Deutsch has improved on Popper.
I had in mind Miller and Deutsch.
Which Miller publication or argument?
Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defense and Out of Error: Further Essays On Critical Rationalism.
Thanks I ordered them. I’d only read individual articles of his.
Hume would agree because he never accepted the full force of his own argument. He couldn’t imagine how people can create knowledge without induction even though he could see that induction is impossible. It took Popper to explain how knowledge can be created without induction.