I agree—I really liked the way this article was formatted, but perhaps it would make more sense if the “in conclusion” paragraph was part of the “criticism”. Then you can just have a thesis for that section, with a relatively neutral summary and background literature.
On the other hand, perhaps it was supposed to be the lifehacking takeaway—in which case maybe another header was in order, and it should be opened with something other than “in conclusion”.
I agree—I really liked the way this article was formatted, but perhaps it would make more sense if the “in conclusion” paragraph was part of the “criticism”. Then you can just have a thesis for that section, with a relatively neutral summary and background literature.
On the other hand, perhaps it was supposed to be the lifehacking takeaway—in which case maybe another header was in order, and it should be opened with something other than “in conclusion”.