At the same time, I don’t want to fall for the Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle and assume that both perspectives are equally valid.
Minor possible quibble: based on the definition in the link given, I think Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle doesn’t refer to assuming a the deep wisdom position that two sides of a debate each have merit.
The fallacy of the undistributed middle (Lat. non distributio medii) is a formal fallacy that is committed when the middle term in a categorical syllogism is not distributed in either the minor premise or the major premise. It is thus a syllogistic fallacy.)
Minor possible quibble: based on the definition in the link given, I think Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle doesn’t refer to assuming a the deep wisdom position that two sides of a debate each have merit.