Thanks for your attention. I’m going to answer you with my dyslexia, because it seems better than going through an LLM and something less personal. Be prepared, haha. Yes, it was difficult for me, but I read the rationality from A to Z and everything, and I see that there’s a lot of sense in everything here. I just miss that more rational connection. I’m saying, take a leap of faith, without showing all the inferential steps necessary for the conclusion. Yes, I see that it’s more poetic and inspirational, even though he didn’t explicitly cite it, it seems the most likely. Yes, I see many signs of Yudukowski’s struggle. He’s the Bayesian rationality fighter I love the most, both for his goals and his style. However, I’m particularly looking for that, how to structure latent virtues or values with the fewest possible inferential steps. Level of objective greed: very difficult. Risks: even more so. Haha. And you, how are you trying to be better?
Thanks for your attention. I’m going to answer you with my dyslexia, because it seems better than going through an LLM and something less personal. Be prepared, haha.
Yes, it was difficult for me, but I read the rationality from A to Z and everything, and I see that there’s a lot of sense in everything here. I just miss that more rational connection. I’m saying, take a leap of faith, without showing all the inferential steps necessary for the conclusion.
Yes, I see that it’s more poetic and inspirational, even though he didn’t explicitly cite it, it seems the most likely.
Yes, I see many signs of Yudukowski’s struggle. He’s the Bayesian rationality fighter I love the most, both for his goals and his style.
However, I’m particularly looking for that, how to structure latent virtues or values with the fewest possible inferential steps. Level of objective greed: very difficult. Risks: even more so. Haha.
And you, how are you trying to be better?