Fair enough. I only read the article you linked, not the additional source material; I’m prepared to believe given additional evidence like what you cite here that her analysis is… er… can one say “pre-hoc”?
can one say “pre-hoc”?
Ante hoc.
Well, if not, one ought to be able to. I hereby grant you permission! :)
Fair enough. I only read the article you linked, not the additional source material; I’m prepared to believe given additional evidence like what you cite here that her analysis is… er… can one say “pre-hoc”?
Ante hoc.
Well, if not, one ought to be able to. I hereby grant you permission! :)