On your ‘about’ page as well as in the linked article, you criticize GiveWell for vote counting. The example you cite of this is their microfinance review. I don’t know how solid this review was, but there are at least plausible reasons for treating the null results as negative evidence in this case, and I would bet on GiveWell’s analysis over your meta-analysis but not confidently.
Do you stand by the claim that GiveWell’s analysis is badly flawed and that donors should trust your meta-analysis of microfinance instead? If so, I’ll look into the case more closely and update my views accordingly.
On your ‘about’ page as well as in the linked article, you criticize GiveWell for vote counting. The example you cite of this is their microfinance review. I don’t know how solid this review was, but there are at least plausible reasons for treating the null results as negative evidence in this case, and I would bet on GiveWell’s analysis over your meta-analysis but not confidently.
Do you stand by the claim that GiveWell’s analysis is badly flawed and that donors should trust your meta-analysis of microfinance instead? If so, I’ll look into the case more closely and update my views accordingly.