You say that this is part five of five, but I’ve only been able to locate part 1 and part 2.
ETA: ah, gotcha. You said that part 3 and 4 were less interesting so you’ll skip those. But then if you say this is part 5, things get confused. It’s probably better to say that explicitely or rename this as part 3, but at this point it’s your call.
You say that this is part five of five, but I’ve only been able to locate part 1 and part 2.
ETA: ah, gotcha. You said that part 3 and 4 were less interesting so you’ll skip those. But then if you say this is part 5, things get confused. It’s probably better to say that explicitely or rename this as part 3, but at this point it’s your call.
Thanks for the heads-up on the weird numbering. Part 3 and Part 4 are on my blog if anyone is curious.
(I think I’ll just add the above text to the heading in this one.)