Of course there would probably be more “rational” slave camps on average than “sadistic” ones. I’m going for the worst case scenarios here simply because… why shouldn’t I? I see zero evidence that, among a million patches, the worst cases would never ever arise once.
Psychopaths/sadists have amassed capital before, they have amassed influence before, they have gained partners’ trust before. Why wouldn’t they be able to exchange those for total+secure sovereignity within a Patchwork model?
I see zero evidence that, among a million patches, the worst cases would never ever arise once.
Looking at the real world spending of people with power and wealth and the traits these people have it seems to me that you would see many many more Dubai’s and Singapore’s than summer camps for sadists.
Why is one in a million that terrible? Its a far better track record than democracy or monarchy have… Indeed why would one in a hundred or one in ten be that horrible? Your opinion if this is an acceptable utilitarian trade and even desirable compared to modern third world misery, depend strongly on where you stand on torture vs. dust specks.
Looking at the real world spending of people with power and wealth and the traits these people have it seems to me that you would see many many more Dubai’s and Singapore’s than summer camps for sadists.
In the 20th century, in a world where democracy and human rights are actively promoted, all factors that would be missing from Moldburgia. Look at the real world behaviour of autocrats in the past.
No one. But then don’t invoke Hitler or Kim or Stalin, invoke slave ownership.
Of course there would probably be more “rational” slave camps on average than “sadistic” ones. I’m going for the worst case scenarios here simply because… why shouldn’t I? I see zero evidence that, among a million patches, the worst cases would never ever arise once.
Psychopaths/sadists have amassed capital before, they have amassed influence before, they have gained partners’ trust before. Why wouldn’t they be able to exchange those for total+secure sovereignity within a Patchwork model?
Looking at the real world spending of people with power and wealth and the traits these people have it seems to me that you would see many many more Dubai’s and Singapore’s than summer camps for sadists.
Why is one in a million that terrible? Its a far better track record than democracy or monarchy have… Indeed why would one in a hundred or one in ten be that horrible? Your opinion if this is an acceptable utilitarian trade and even desirable compared to modern third world misery, depend strongly on where you stand on torture vs. dust specks.
In the 20th century, in a world where democracy and human rights are actively promoted, all factors that would be missing from Moldburgia. Look at the real world behaviour of autocrats in the past.