Unsurprisingly, I’d love it if you reviewed any of my posts.
Since you said “technical,” I suggest this one in particular. It’s a big deal IMO because Armstrong & Mindermann’s argument has been cited approvingly by many people and seems to be still widely regarded as correct, but if I’m right, it’s actually a bad argument. I’d love a third perspective on this that helps me figure out what’s going on.
More generally I’d recommend sorting all AF posts by karma and reviewing the ones that got the most, since presumably karma correlates with how much people here like the post and thus it’s extra important to find flaws in high-karma posts.
Insofar as you want to do others of mine, my top recommendation would be this one since it got less feedback than I expected and is my most important timelines-related post of all time IMO.
I’m more interested in feedback on the +12 OOMs one because it’s more decision-relevant. It’s more of a fuzzy thing, not crunchy logic like the first one I recommended, and therefore less suitable for your purposes (or so I thought when I first answered your question, now I am not sure)
Great idea! Thanks for doing this!
Unsurprisingly, I’d love it if you reviewed any of my posts.
Since you said “technical,” I suggest this one in particular. It’s a big deal IMO because Armstrong & Mindermann’s argument has been cited approvingly by many people and seems to be still widely regarded as correct, but if I’m right, it’s actually a bad argument. I’d love a third perspective on this that helps me figure out what’s going on.
More generally I’d recommend sorting all AF posts by karma and reviewing the ones that got the most, since presumably karma correlates with how much people here like the post and thus it’s extra important to find flaws in high-karma posts.
I was indeed expecting you to suggest one of your post. But that’s one of the valid reasons I listed, and I didn’t know about this one, so it’s great!
We’ll consider it. :)
Insofar as you want to do others of mine, my top recommendation would be this one since it got less feedback than I expected and is my most important timelines-related post of all time IMO.
If we do only one, which one do you think matters the most?
I’m more interested in feedback on the +12 OOMs one because it’s more decision-relevant. It’s more of a fuzzy thing, not crunchy logic like the first one I recommended, and therefore less suitable for your purposes (or so I thought when I first answered your question, now I am not sure)