“tries to pretend there is just one world give nwhat we do know about physics would be batshit crazy” what?
All we ever have observed supports a single universe…
When you try to postulate infinite worlds to explain QM, you end up getting QM wrong, so it would be batshit crazy to insist on othe worlds.
Well, i’d like to know how you can defend an interpretation of a theory that is all about the Born Rule as correct when it does not get the Born Rule right?
“tries to pretend there is just one world give nwhat we do know about physics would be batshit crazy” what? All we ever have observed supports a single universe… When you try to postulate infinite worlds to explain QM, you end up getting QM wrong, so it would be batshit crazy to insist on othe worlds.
Ok, that clarifies your position somewhat.
Well, i’d like to know how you can defend an interpretation of a theory that is all about the Born Rule as correct when it does not get the Born Rule right?
The Born rule ends up being postulated in one disguise or another in any interpretation, with various degrees of success.