I’m not claiming to be >95% sure or anything like that, and so I don’t see why I’d need such strong evidence as personally knowing “these people”.
Do you have any evidence at all for your psychologising?
Doing some fnord-extraction on the OP:
″… fantastic post … these moneybag guys .. here’s how I see … probably makes my opinions pretty clear … I doubt that … I’m sure … It could be the case that … but I doubt it … the most important things … There seems to be … I’m sure they feel … Or maybe not … But if … I understand that there’s probably … I’m sure that … I’m sure that … I’m sure that … might be … don’t seem to be … A big reason … this impression … seems to apply … get the impression …”
This sort of writing, wherever I see it, gives me “the impression” that the writer is putting in the dubifiers to excuse themselves from presenting any evidence.
Do you have any evidence at all for your psychologising?
Doing some fnord-extraction on the OP:
″… fantastic post … these moneybag guys .. here’s how I see … probably makes my opinions pretty clear … I doubt that … I’m sure … It could be the case that … but I doubt it … the most important things … There seems to be … I’m sure they feel … Or maybe not … But if … I understand that there’s probably … I’m sure that … I’m sure that … I’m sure that … might be … don’t seem to be … A big reason … this impression … seems to apply … get the impression …”
This sort of writing, wherever I see it, gives me “the impression” that the writer is putting in the dubifiers to excuse themselves from presenting any evidence.