It would seem that most of the responders are hopelessly literal....
Your quote is both literally and connotatively poor. If Spielberg had asked “Why spend two dollars on a bookmark? … Why not use a dollar as a bookmark?” then there would at least have been some moral along the lines of efficient practicality. Even then it would be borderline.
Your quote is both literally and connotatively poor. If Spielberg had asked “Why spend two dollars on a bookmark? … Why not use a dollar as a bookmark?” then there would at least have been some moral along the lines of efficient practicality.
A dollar is much more fungible than a bookmark. After you’re done reading your book, you can not only use the dollar to hold your place in other books, you can spend it on other things.
A dollar is much more fungible than a bookmark. After you’re done reading your book, you can not only use the dollar to hold your place in other books, you can spend it on other things.
It is indeed a considerably more fungible one dollar.
Your quote is both literally and connotatively poor. If Spielberg had asked “Why spend two dollars on a bookmark? … Why not use a dollar as a bookmark?” then there would at least have been some moral along the lines of efficient practicality. Even then it would be borderline.
A dollar is much more fungible than a bookmark. After you’re done reading your book, you can not only use the dollar to hold your place in other books, you can spend it on other things.
It is indeed a considerably more fungible one dollar.
It takes time and effort (admittedly not much of it, but usually even little of it makes a difference psychologically) to spend $1 on a bookmark. (I would have phrased it as “Why bother spending …”.)