Sure, valueless political discussions are valueless, and valuable ones aren’t. Of course.
The question is whether we {do, should, can} condition our rejection of a discussion on its valuelessness rather than its political character. The implicit suggestion is that rather than treating political discussions as something special, we ought to enforce the general rule of rejecting valueless discussion.
The main difficulty I see is that we don’t actually seem to enforce such a general rule.
I’d rather say that the “political character” of a discussion on an open internet forum like this—one not devoted to politics—tends to be a very good predictor that the discussion will be valueless, or worse. I’m sure there would be exceptions, but I don’t know that this is shows much of an error in the existing karma system.
Sure, valueless political discussions are valueless, and valuable ones aren’t. Of course.
The question is whether we {do, should, can} condition our rejection of a discussion on its valuelessness rather than its political character. The implicit suggestion is that rather than treating political discussions as something special, we ought to enforce the general rule of rejecting valueless discussion.
The main difficulty I see is that we don’t actually seem to enforce such a general rule.
I’d rather say that the “political character” of a discussion on an open internet forum like this—one not devoted to politics—tends to be a very good predictor that the discussion will be valueless, or worse. I’m sure there would be exceptions, but I don’t know that this is shows much of an error in the existing karma system.