I have embarrassingly not actually reviewed this, and yet something like this post is probably one of my core worldview principles, and in particular it’s use of examples across the industry is refreshing.
+4 for both putting a grounded argument, and being well articulated.
One of my perennial criticisms that LW thankfully is doing better on is undervaluing the power of high-speed stupidity, combined with it’s arguments against doing so being surprisingly weak.
(For example, I consider tailcalled’s response here to a detailed comment of mine that, if the comment is true to be a very big epistemic failure, and it’s exactly the failure that would prevent high-speed stupidity from working):
I have embarrassingly not actually reviewed this, and yet something like this post is probably one of my core worldview principles, and in particular it’s use of examples across the industry is refreshing.
+4 for both putting a grounded argument, and being well articulated.
One of my perennial criticisms that LW thankfully is doing better on is undervaluing the power of high-speed stupidity, combined with it’s arguments against doing so being surprisingly weak.
(For example, I consider tailcalled’s response here to a detailed comment of mine that, if the comment is true to be a very big epistemic failure, and it’s exactly the failure that would prevent high-speed stupidity from working):
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/7Z4WC4AFgfmZ3fCDC/?commentId=dqtvMf9PN2naDHRsx
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/7Z4WC4AFgfmZ3fCDC/#AkDhXmed2rmfkP6eQ