What do you think about an alternative (/complementary) approach like: Take some conceptual questions that have been well-studied but aren’t public, and get really thorough rubrics of objective good and bad reasoning patterns that show up in answers to those questions?
What do you think about an alternative (/complementary) approach like: Take some conceptual questions that have been well-studied but aren’t public, and get really thorough rubrics of objective good and bad reasoning patterns that show up in answers to those questions?