But it was always based on a stupid idea: make AGI open source.
That’s not what follows from the email archives.
Contrary, they believe that being open-source is a great strategy for the early stage of OpenAI which ought to be changed later. Take a look at the email from Jan 2, 2016 9:06 AM:
[when we are close to AGI] it’s totally OK to not share the science (even though sharing everything is definitely the right strategy in the short and possibly medium term for recruitment purposes).
That’s not what follows from the email archives.
Contrary, they believe that being open-source is a great strategy for the early stage of OpenAI which ought to be changed later. Take a look at the email from Jan 2, 2016 9:06 AM: