Regarding the “no subjective dependencies” assumption: I might be missing something obvious, but do you have a proof that this assumption is true in some non-trivial cases? For example, when the players are perfectly symmetric?
Also, you say “the second complication is that all Nash equilibria are correlated equilibria, so maybe logical inductors converge to Nash equilibria in most cases.” In what sense it that a “complication”?
Regarding the “no subjective dependencies” assumption: I might be missing something obvious, but do you have a proof that this assumption is true in some non-trivial cases? For example, when the players are perfectly symmetric?
Also, you say “the second complication is that all Nash equilibria are correlated equilibria, so maybe logical inductors converge to Nash equilibria in most cases.” In what sense it that a “complication”?