Asking for a $100k iPhone is like asking for a million-dollar Toyota Prius instead of a million-dollar car.
You can spend $100k on a smartphone if you really want, but it’s not going to be an iPhone because Apple doesn’t license out its OS for other manufacturers to use.
Asking for a $100k iPhone is like asking for a million-dollar Toyota Prius instead of a million-dollar car.
I disagree, there is no company that only builds >10k smart phones (from scratch, as opposed to taking someone else’s phones and adding expensive materials). Sure there are companies that will gold-plate your iPhone, but they’re not taking on the risk that innovations in smartphones would cause their luxury product to become worthless (since they can always gold-plate whatever the most recent innovation is).
i think there is a false premise assumed here. a lot of products are not luxury products because of superior quality that can be innovated past. it’s primarily raw signaling value, sort of fiated by the brand.
Asking for a $100k iPhone is like asking for a million-dollar Toyota Prius instead of a million-dollar car.
You can spend $100k on a smartphone if you really want, but it’s not going to be an iPhone because Apple doesn’t license out its OS for other manufacturers to use.
I disagree, there is no company that only builds >10k smart phones (from scratch, as opposed to taking someone else’s phones and adding expensive materials). Sure there are companies that will gold-plate your iPhone, but they’re not taking on the risk that innovations in smartphones would cause their luxury product to become worthless (since they can always gold-plate whatever the most recent innovation is).
i think there is a false premise assumed here. a lot of products are not luxury products because of superior quality that can be innovated past. it’s primarily raw signaling value, sort of fiated by the brand.
Did you check the link I gave?