You were replying to someone new here, with statements that are very easy to read in very confused ways. So I attempted to reformulate them clearly, with a secondary objective of possibly catching something that you were also conflating in your own mind.
There is actually something directly relevant to flaritza’s question in an expanded definition of rationality, though not useful. If rationality comprises patterns of thought that help with cognition and its many purposes, and there is a cognition-related problem like emotions acting up in nonstandard ways, perhaps interfering with usual communication norms or objecting to usual communication norms, this calls for patterns of emotional rationality that improve the situation. This is not useful because I don’t have (references about) particular patterns of emotional rationality to offer. But there might be some discussion of this, and should be even if there isn’t.
You were replying to someone new here, with statements that are very easy to read in very confused ways. So I attempted to reformulate them clearly, with a secondary objective of possibly catching something that you were also conflating in your own mind.
There is actually something directly relevant to flaritza’s question in an expanded definition of rationality, though not useful. If rationality comprises patterns of thought that help with cognition and its many purposes, and there is a cognition-related problem like emotions acting up in nonstandard ways, perhaps interfering with usual communication norms or objecting to usual communication norms, this calls for patterns of emotional rationality that improve the situation. This is not useful because I don’t have (references about) particular patterns of emotional rationality to offer. But there might be some discussion of this, and should be even if there isn’t.