I suppose it would depend on specific properties of the solution; most importantly, whether it makes the AI development significantly more expensive.
If it is not too expensive, projects probably will use it, not necessarily because they genuinely care about safety, but because “safety” is another checkbox they will be able to mark on their product. The greatest risk here is that the version actually implemented will differ from the proposed solution, maybe even become its very opposite (like what happens when software companies try to become “agile”).
If it is too expensive, then the projects will probably avoid it. Unless perhaps the rich corporations decide that making it mandatory is a great way to get rid of the competition, in which case they would lobby the regulators to make it mandatory.
(So… does it mean we should actually hope that the solution is super expensive? Not sure, because both things can happen simultaneously: the rich corporations using regulators to make “safety” mandatory, and then creating their own corporate flavor of “safety” that preserves some of the rituals but ignores the inconvenient critical parts.)
I suppose it would depend on specific properties of the solution; most importantly, whether it makes the AI development significantly more expensive.
If it is not too expensive, projects probably will use it, not necessarily because they genuinely care about safety, but because “safety” is another checkbox they will be able to mark on their product. The greatest risk here is that the version actually implemented will differ from the proposed solution, maybe even become its very opposite (like what happens when software companies try to become “agile”).
If it is too expensive, then the projects will probably avoid it. Unless perhaps the rich corporations decide that making it mandatory is a great way to get rid of the competition, in which case they would lobby the regulators to make it mandatory.
(So… does it mean we should actually hope that the solution is super expensive? Not sure, because both things can happen simultaneously: the rich corporations using regulators to make “safety” mandatory, and then creating their own corporate flavor of “safety” that preserves some of the rituals but ignores the inconvenient critical parts.)