it does seem like violence is the logical conclusion of their worldview
It’s not expected to be effective, as has been repeatedly pointed out, it’s not a valid conclusion. Only state-backed law/treaty enforcement has the staying power to coerce history. The question of whyit’s taboo is separate, but before that there is an issue with the premise.
The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand certainly coerced history, and it wasn’t state-backed. So did that of Julius Ceasar, as would have Hitler’s, had it been accomplished.
You write:
It’s not expected to be effective, as has been repeatedly pointed out, it’s not a valid conclusion. Only state-backed law/treaty enforcement has the staying power to coerce history. The question of why it’s taboo is separate, but before that there is an issue with the premise.
The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand certainly coerced history, and it wasn’t state-backed. So did that of Julius Ceasar, as would have Hitler’s, had it been accomplished.