Why a single necessary and sufficient policy? What if the most realistic way of helping everyone is several policies that are by themselves insufficient, but together sufficient? Doesn’t this focus us on dramatic actions unhelpfully, in the same way that a “pivotal act” arguably so focuses us?
I agree the phrasing here is maybe bad, but I think its generally accepted that “X and Y” is a policy when “X” and “Y” are independently policies, so I would expect a set of policies which are together sufficient would be an appropriate answer.
I agree the phrasing here is maybe bad, but I think its generally accepted that “X and Y” is a policy when “X” and “Y” are independently policies, so I would expect a set of policies which are together sufficient would be an appropriate answer.