Now, there isn’t a perfect consensus on these issues. For probability, there’s the debate between Bayesians and frequentists. I may think the Bayesian perspective is superior, and points to a specific understanding of randomness as a subjective phenomenon (so randomness and uncertainty are really the same thing).
Funny how the adoption of a particular framework of probability theory, for pragmatic reasons can prove something about reality.
Funny how the adoption of a particular framework of probability theory, for pragmatic reasons can prove something about reality.