I hope this does not bump the thread up but, 254? Sounds perfect for AlGaN. Surely someone has a need for a ruggedized, effective, but not too eye/skin-safe UVC light source.
But we weren’t talking about 254, we were talking about 222, so that it could / should be skin-safe, at least.
I hope this does not bump the thread up but, 254? Sounds perfect for AlGaN. Surely someone has a need for a ruggedized, effective, but not too eye/skin-safe UVC light source.
But we weren’t talking about 254, we were talking about 222, so that it could / should be skin-safe, at least.