I’m not sure what you mean by that. I was just trying to describe how Georgism controls land rights. Ownership and possession both have very different definitions in most legal systems.
The distinction between “possession” and “ownership” is just “renting” or “borrowing”. Virtually everyone has rented or borrowed something before—an apartment, a car, a pencil from their schoolmate. I don’t see why cleaving this distinction would not be a “winnable battle” given that everyone has first-hand understanding of it.
I’m not sure that cleaving a distinction between the meanings of “possession” and “ownership” is a winnable battle.
I’m not sure what you mean by that. I was just trying to describe how Georgism controls land rights. Ownership and possession both have very different definitions in most legal systems.
The distinction between “possession” and “ownership” is just “renting” or “borrowing”. Virtually everyone has rented or borrowed something before—an apartment, a car, a pencil from their schoolmate. I don’t see why cleaving this distinction would not be a “winnable battle” given that everyone has first-hand understanding of it.