The point is, I know of a few people, acquaintances of mine, who, even when asked to try to find flaws, could not detect anything weird or mistaken in the GPT-2-generated samples.
There are probably a lot of people who would be completely taken in by literal “fake news”, as in, computer-generated fake articles and blog posts. This is pretty alarming. Even more alarming: unless I make a conscious effort to read carefully, I would be one of them.
I’m a little uncertain of how I would test this since it seems predicated on selection effects around which people you ask. This continues throughout the post.
I’d love to see some kind of data collection about the subject, some of which is suggested in the post like measuring alpha vs. beta waves, or how related this is to cognitive reflection tests.
There’s are factual claims in this section:
I’m a little uncertain of how I would test this since it seems predicated on selection effects around which people you ask. This continues throughout the post.
I’d love to see some kind of data collection about the subject, some of which is suggested in the post like measuring alpha vs. beta waves, or how related this is to cognitive reflection tests.