Thanks for the feedback. We’d genuinely find it useful to know which specific claims or passages read as incoherent—the post is an introduction to a framework, not an explanation of it, but if the structure itself is failing that’s worth knowing before the sequence posts that do the explaining. The working papers are at the Zenodo links if the framework itself is what seems slop-like rather than the presentation.
This is incoherent slop. It’s somehow significantly worse writing than if you just asked a frontier LLM to write a good post explaining the idea.
Thanks for the feedback. We’d genuinely find it useful to know which specific claims or passages read as incoherent—the post is an introduction to a framework, not an explanation of it, but if the structure itself is failing that’s worth knowing before the sequence posts that do the explaining. The working papers are at the Zenodo links if the framework itself is what seems slop-like rather than the presentation.