I appreciate these summaries and the following discussions, but I don’t think each chapter merits a separate top-level post. When your summary is short and you’re not arguing with D, as here, only a few posts are needed for the whole book.
Phil Goetz: If this comment or the above comment are voted up higher than the post itself, please do not continue your chapter-by-chapter summaries. I will remove them if you do. One more post for the rest of the book.
I appreciate these summaries and the following discussions, but I don’t think each chapter merits a separate top-level post. When your summary is short and you’re not arguing with D, as here, only a few posts are needed for the whole book.
Phil Goetz: If this comment or the above comment are voted up higher than the post itself, please do not continue your chapter-by-chapter summaries. I will remove them if you do. One more post for the rest of the book.
Okay. You don’t need to threaten removal. I may never get around to finishing the book, though.
This reads as unnecessary (preemptive) aggression to me.
I agree. This sort of discussion would be fine for a book club but here 14 posts for a single book is a bit much.