(Suggstion: Vote on likelihood ratios, not posterior probabilities. (I find it unlikely that this post deserves to be downvoted on its own merits. The continued political downvoting saddens me.))
Vladimir_Nesov correctly interpreted me in that thread. Everybody else just had a lot of fun taking turns talking about how I am bad at communication (bad at trying to communicate), as if that was something I didn’t already have a detailed model of.
It’s like I’m not even trying to communicate an answer to your question with this comment. And it’s like I’m trying to reserve the right to get upset with you if you don’t see why this comment is clever.
(Suggstion: Vote on likelihood ratios, not posterior probabilities. (I find it unlikely that this post deserves to be downvoted on its own merits. The continued political downvoting saddens me.))
I am new to LessWrong, so can you please explain why you should be downvoted?
Will Newsome thinks he’s a rationalist hipster. See this comment thread if you really want to know.
Vladimir_Nesov correctly interpreted me in that thread. Everybody else just had a lot of fun taking turns talking about how I am bad at communication (bad at trying to communicate), as if that was something I didn’t already have a detailed model of.
Well, to be fair he kind of is a rationalist hipster, for certain values of ‘hipster’.
(No offense, Will.)
It’s like I’m not even trying to communicate an answer to your question with this comment. And it’s like I’m trying to reserve the right to get upset with you if you don’t see why this comment is clever.
Person who downvoted me, I am upset with you!!!!!! rah rah rah