Has anyone else noticed Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview excessively using math? I’ve asked quite a few models to comment on my Hamlet pastiche and I think 3.1 Pro Preview is the only one (and consistently) to use a decent amount of math in its analysis. While not entirely inappropriate, it seems like a signal that the RL is getting to the model...
Has anyone else noticed Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview excessively using math? I’ve asked quite a few models to comment on my Hamlet pastiche and I think 3.1 Pro Preview is the only one (and consistently) to use a decent amount of math in its analysis. While not entirely inappropriate, it seems like a signal that the RL is getting to the model...