Possibly! But my sense is that philosophy tends to assume there are better (or less wrong) answers. And my point is that without standards to solve them and a closing mechanism, there’s no real way of aligning. Philosophy needs something else to do the deciding for it. I am sceptical about the idea of moral truth, or truth in knowledge at all: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hcymnEAKtwvED7Y8o/what-are-we-actually-evaluating-when-we-say-a-belief-tracks
Possibly! But my sense is that philosophy tends to assume there are better (or less wrong) answers. And my point is that without standards to solve them and a closing mechanism, there’s no real way of aligning. Philosophy needs something else to do the deciding for it. I am sceptical about the idea of moral truth, or truth in knowledge at all: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hcymnEAKtwvED7Y8o/what-are-we-actually-evaluating-when-we-say-a-belief-tracks