Just have an explicit theory which you use for moral reasoning, where results can be proved or disproved. Then you will always give the same answer, regardless of the presentation of details your moral theory doesn’t care about.
This is roughly the point where some bloody philosopher invokes Hume’s Fork, mutters something about meta-ethics, and tells you to fuck off back to the science departments where you came from.
This is roughly the point where some bloody philosopher invokes Hume’s Fork, mutters something about meta-ethics, and tells you to fuck off back to the science departments where you came from.